Author |
Message |
|
|
Post subject: |
|
|
|
It can't be that everything is beneficial for d4 teams. At some point in time, it has to be competitive right. If 2nd in the group gets to play home, all teams would wanna be 2nd!!
It can't be that everything is beneficial for d4 teams. At some point in time, it has to be competitive right. If 2nd in the group gets to play home, all teams would wanna be 2nd!!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 07 Oct 2009, 14:04 |
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: |
|
|
|
crazyfrog wrote: Well, there has to be a way of differentiating teams, and of course we could take ball possession as an indicator of team performance too. But things like first goal or number of yellows would not be indicative of which team is better. Taking ratings would allow to differentiate which team had the slight edge in an even game, as ratings indicate player performance.
maybee...
but like i say before you have create seeds 1 to 4 because we have "big" and "small" teams and but the small playing home all games you give same advantage to litle teams.
now in second part of YT home factor is important, a team who have finish second have low chance of beating a better team who have finish first and play home...
next season you could make diferent second in group play home X first other group.
small team have more chance (????)
[quote="crazyfrog"]Well, there has to be a way of differentiating teams, and of course we could take ball possession as an indicator of team performance too. But things like first goal or number of yellows would not be indicative of which team is better. Taking ratings would allow to differentiate which team had the slight edge in an even game, as ratings indicate player performance.[/quote]
maybee...
but like i say before you have create seeds 1 to 4 because we have "big" and "small" teams and but the small playing home all games you give same advantage to litle teams.
now in second part of YT home factor is important, a team who have finish second have low chance of beating a better team who have finish first and play home...
next season you could make diferent second in group play home X first other group.
small team have more chance (????)
|
|
|
|
Posted: 05 Oct 2009, 16:39 |
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: |
|
|
|
Well, there has to be a way of differentiating teams, and of course we could take ball possession as an indicator of team performance too. But things like first goal or number of yellows would not be indicative of which team is better. Taking ratings would allow to differentiate which team had the slight edge in an even game, as ratings indicate player performance.
Well, there has to be a way of differentiating teams, and of course we could take ball possession as an indicator of team performance too. But things like first goal or number of yellows would not be indicative of which team is better. Taking ratings would allow to differentiate which team had the slight edge in an even game, as ratings indicate player performance.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 05 Oct 2009, 14:52 |
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: |
|
|
|
crazyfrog wrote: yeah they are right, my bad for not including it in the rules sheet! so sorry judd!
In first part of tournement the lower rank team have same advantage play all games home, now and since we have no seeds the teams who have play home home have more advantage so is unfair this kind of judgement.
I have play away i made a great result whith a better team and you put me away because my player have not a good point skill...
why not who have score first goal? or who have less yelow or red card??
[quote="crazyfrog"]yeah they are right, my bad for not including it in the rules sheet! so sorry judd![/quote]
In first part of tournement the lower rank team have same advantage play all games home, now and since we have no seeds the teams who have play home home have more advantage so is unfair this kind of judgement.
I have play away i made a great result whith a better team and you put me away because my player have not a good point skill...
why not who have score first goal? or who have less yelow or red card??
|
|
|
|
Posted: 05 Oct 2009, 11:39 |
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: |
|
|
|
yeah they are right, my bad for not including it in the rules sheet! so sorry judd!
yeah they are right, my bad for not including it in the rules sheet! so sorry judd!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 05 Oct 2009, 06:10 |
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: |
|
|
|
in previous tournements, first rule in case of a draw was the sum of your player's ratings
in previous tournements, first rule in case of a draw was the sum of your player's ratings
|
|
|
|
Posted: 04 Oct 2009, 11:34 |
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: |
|
|
|
judd wrote: Can't see anything in the tournie rules about this, but in the knockout stages who goes through in the case of a draw? first scorer/last scorer/most corners/most possession...??? Drew my game so just wondering http://www.footballglory.com/seasons/cu ... hp?id=6466
In the early days it was the player avg game points
[quote="judd"]Can't see anything in the tournie rules about this, but in the knockout stages who goes through in the case of a draw? first scorer/last scorer/most corners/most possession...??? Drew my game so just wondering http://www.footballglory.com/seasons/current/match.php?id=6466[/quote]
In the early days it was the player avg game points :)
|
|
|
|
Posted: 04 Oct 2009, 11:29 |
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: |
|
|
|
Can't see anything in the tournie rules about this, but in the knockout stages who goes through in the case of a draw? first scorer/last scorer/most corners/most possession...???
Drew my game so just wondering
http://www.footballglory.com/seasons/cu ... hp?id=6466
Can't see anything in the tournie rules about this, but in the knockout stages who goes through in the case of a draw? first scorer/last scorer/most corners/most possession...???
Drew my game so just wondering
http://www.footballglory.com/seasons/current/match.php?id=6466
|
|
|
|
Posted: 04 Oct 2009, 11:23 |
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: |
|
|
|
Bluto wrote: Waiting for the manager of Chisinau to cancel their friendly that they've arranged already for the 4th FGM sent.
Still no game sorted, so I've had to ask for a friendly so I don't lose out on the chance to play a match
[quote="Bluto"]Waiting for the manager of Chisinau to cancel their friendly that they've arranged already for the 4th :( FGM sent.[/quote]
Still no game sorted, so I've had to ask for a friendly so I don't lose out on the chance to play a match
|
|
|
|
Posted: 03 Oct 2009, 11:38 |
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: |
|
|
|
Waiting for the manager of Chisinau to cancel their friendly that they've arranged already for the 4th FGM sent.
Waiting for the manager of Chisinau to cancel their friendly that they've arranged already for the 4th :( FGM sent.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 01 Oct 2009, 22:09 |
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 29 Sep 2009, 13:39 |
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: |
|
|
|
Just waiting for my opposition to accept(Bologna) the match.
Just waiting for my opposition to accept(Bologna) the match.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 27 Sep 2009, 22:47 |
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: |
|
|
|
Hi Crazy--just got in and found Rotor Volgograd played a full team of 27-28yos in our 0-0 draw. Probably should count as a 3-0 to me. Also they have already set up a friendly against someone not in the tournament on 4th Oct.
http://www.footballglory.com/seasons/cu ... hp?id=5603
a 3-0 would put me second. So should I reg with Diaraf?
Hi Crazy--just got in and found Rotor Volgograd played a full team of 27-28yos in our 0-0 draw. Probably should count as a 3-0 to me. Also they have already set up a friendly against someone not in the tournament on 4th Oct.
http://www.footballglory.com/seasons/current/match.php?id=5603
a 3-0 would put me second. So should I reg with Diaraf?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 27 Sep 2009, 17:03 |
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: |
|
|
|
Roda vs Kaunas (E)
Goteborg vs Wrexham (G)
Zagreb vs Grasshoppers (C)
Dunaferr vs Chivas (E)
Haka vs Crete (B)
Tolima vs Westerlo (D)
Tbilisi vs Chisinau (G)
Groningen vs Sovetov (A)
Wronki vs Akraness (F)
Monaco vs Kyiv (B)
Lyn vs Honved (H)
Diaraf vs Rotor (D)
Bologna vs Aberdeen (H)
Palmeira vs Domagnano (F)
Porto vs Valur (C)
Dortmund vs Drogheda (A)
Roda vs Kaunas (E)
Goteborg vs Wrexham (G)
Zagreb vs Grasshoppers (C)
Dunaferr vs Chivas (E)
Haka vs Crete (B)
Tolima vs Westerlo (D)
Tbilisi vs Chisinau (G)
Groningen vs Sovetov (A)
Wronki vs Akraness (F)
Monaco vs Kyiv (B)
Lyn vs Honved (H)
Diaraf vs Rotor (D)
Bologna vs Aberdeen (H)
Palmeira vs Domagnano (F)
Porto vs Valur (C)
Dortmund vs Drogheda (A)
|
|
|
|
Posted: 27 Sep 2009, 13:44 |
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: |
|
|
|
Here are who's qualified. In brackets are the original seedings, fixtures will be duly edited in the fixtures post.
GROUP 1
1: Roda (3)
2: Drogheda (4)
GROUP 2
1: Goteborg (1)
2: Valur (3)
GROUP 3
1: Zagreb (1)
2: Domagnano (2)
GROUP 4
1: Dunaferr (1)
2: Aberdeen (4)
GROUP 5
1: Haka (1)
2: Rotor (4)
GROUP 6
1: Tolima (2)
2: Honved (4)
GROUP 7
1: Tbilisi (3)
2: Kyiv (2)
GROUP 8
1: Groningen (1)
2: Akraness (4)
GROUP 9
1: Wronki (4)
2: Sovetov (2)
GROUP 10
1: Monaco (1)
2: Chisinau (4)
GROUP 11
1: Lyn (1)
2: Westerlo (2)
GROUP 12
1: Diaraf (4)
2: Crete (3)
GROUP 13
1: Bologna (4)
2: Chivas (1)
GROUP 14
1: Palmeiras (4)
2: Grasshopper (3)
GROUP 15
1: Porto (1)
2: Wrexham (2)
GROUP 16
1: Dortmund (2)
2: Kaunas (3)
Here are who's qualified. In brackets are the original seedings, fixtures will be duly edited in the fixtures post.
GROUP 1
1: Roda (3)
2: Drogheda (4)
GROUP 2
1: Goteborg (1)
2: Valur (3)
GROUP 3
1: Zagreb (1)
2: Domagnano (2)
GROUP 4
1: Dunaferr (1)
2: Aberdeen (4)
GROUP 5
1: Haka (1)
2: Rotor (4)
GROUP 6
1: Tolima (2)
2: Honved (4)
GROUP 7
1: Tbilisi (3)
2: Kyiv (2)
GROUP 8
1: Groningen (1)
2: Akraness (4)
GROUP 9
1: Wronki (4)
2: Sovetov (2)
GROUP 10
1: Monaco (1)
2: Chisinau (4)
GROUP 11
1: Lyn (1)
2: Westerlo (2)
GROUP 12
1: Diaraf (4)
2: Crete (3)
GROUP 13
1: Bologna (4)
2: Chivas (1)
GROUP 14
1: Palmeiras (4)
2: Grasshopper (3)
GROUP 15
1: Porto (1)
2: Wrexham (2)
GROUP 16
1: Dortmund (2)
2: Kaunas (3)
|
|
|
|
Posted: 27 Sep 2009, 13:36 |
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: |
|
|
|
Ben wrote: not being funny but my opponent played a 32yr old oldie , how can that be a ytf tourney , and you say theres nothing wrong , i mean what the hell.
re-read the rules. you can have 2 players over 23 aslong as their wge does not exceed 40k.
[quote="Ben"]not being funny but my opponent played a 32yr old oldie , how can that be a ytf tourney , and you say theres nothing wrong , i mean what the hell.[/quote]
re-read the rules. you can have 2 players over 23 aslong as their wge does not exceed 40k.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 26 Sep 2009, 19:20 |
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: |
|
|
|
not being funny but my opponent played a 32yr old oldie , how can that be a ytf tourney , and you say theres nothing wrong , i mean what the hell.
not being funny but my opponent played a 32yr old oldie , how can that be a ytf tourney , and you say theres nothing wrong , i mean what the hell.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 26 Sep 2009, 18:55 |
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: |
|
|
|
Tables have been updated. I don't have time to check every game so if there are any discrepancies, please inform
Tables have been updated. I don't have time to check every game so if there are any discrepancies, please inform
|
|
|
|
Posted: 26 Sep 2009, 17:57 |
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: |
|
|
|
GROUP 2
Code: No. Team Win Draw Lose GS GA GD Points 1 Goteborg 2 0 0 6 1 5 6 2 Cruzeiro 1 0 1 2 2 0 3 3 Valur 0 1 1 2 3 -1 1 4 Canon 0 1 1 2 6 -4 1
GROUP 2
[code]No. Team Win Draw Lose GS GA GD Points 1 Goteborg 2 0 0 6 1 5 6 2 Cruzeiro 1 0 1 2 2 0 3 3 Valur 0 1 1 2 3 -1 1 4 Canon 0 1 1 2 6 -4 1[/code]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 26 Sep 2009, 14:38 |
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: |
|
|
|
Nice one on the tables!
I'm going to savour the moment being top, it will be the only time
Nice one on the tables!
I'm going to savour the moment being top, it will be the only time :cry:
|
|
|
|
Posted: 25 Sep 2009, 15:57 |
|
|
|